gamingandblackjack.com

26 Jun 2026

Maryland Casino Employee Files Federal Lawsuit Claiming Supervisors Seized $76,000 Tip

Cocktail waitress serving drinks at a casino baccarat table with high-roller activity in the background

A federal lawsuit filed in Maryland details how cocktail waitress Tajia Mackyeon alleges that managers at MGM National Harbor Resort & Casino confiscated a $76,000 tip she received from a high-roller baccarat player, and the case has drawn attention to workplace policies at the property while the suit moves forward through the courts.

The complaint states that the player won several hands at the baccarat table and then confirmed the tip multiple times before handing over the chips, yet supervisors allegedly took the chips away before Mackyeon could exchange them, leaving her without the funds she expected to receive.

Details of the Alleged Incident at MGM National Harbor

According to court filings the high-roller at the baccarat table provided the tip in the form of casino chips after a series of successful wagers, and the player reportedly verified the amount and intent on more than one occasion while Mackyeon stood nearby, but the suit claims that managers intervened directly and removed the chips from her possession before she could complete the transaction at the cage.

The lawsuit further describes how Mackyeon had already begun the process of securing the tip when supervisors stepped in, adn it outlines a sequence of events in which the chips changed hands among staff members before disappearing from her view entirely, prompting her to file the action seeking nearly $1 million in damages for alleged violations of labor laws.

Legal Claims and Requested Damages in the Complaint

Mackyeon’s filing asserts that the confiscation breached Maryland labor statutes that protect employee tips and wages, and the suit requests compensation that includes the original $76,000 amount plus additional damages for lost wages, emotional distress, and legal fees that together approach the $1 million figure cited in the documents.

The complaint also references company policies at MGM National Harbor that teh plaintiff argues were applied in a manner inconsistent with state requirements, while the action seeks both monetary relief and declaratory judgment to clarify how tips must be handled when large sums are involved at table games.

MGM National Harbor Response and Subsequent Filings

MGM National Harbor has disputed aspects of the claims in later court documents, and the company maintains that its managers acted within established procedures when handling the chips in question, though the precise nature of those procedures remains subject to further discovery as the case proceeds.

Observers familiar with similar disputes note that casino operators often cite internal rules about large tips, yet the current lawsuit places those rules under judicial scrutiny because the player’s multiple confirmations are documented in the complaint as evidence that the tip was intended for Mackyeon specifically.

Baccarat gaming table at MGM National Harbor with chips and dealer activity visible

Context of Tip Handling Practices in Maryland Casinos

Maryland gaming regulations require that tips given to employees remain the property of those employees once received, and the lawsuit alleges that MGM National Harbor deviated from this standard when supervisors intervened, while the plaintiff’s attorneys argue that the player’s repeated affirmations created a clear record of intent that should have protected the tip under state law.

The case also touches on broader questions about how high-value tips are processed at table games, because baccarat players sometimes award large gratuities after extended winning streaks, and the suit contends that MGM’s actions created a precedent that could affect other employees who receive comparable sums in the future.

Procedural Status and Next Steps in the Litigation

Federal court records show that the complaint has advanced past initial filings, and both parties have submitted additional documents that address the sequence of events at the baccarat table as well as the company’s internal tip policies, with discovery expected to continue through the coming months.

Attorneys for Mackyeon have indicated that they will seek testimony from the high-roller who provided the tip along with other casino staff members who were present, while MGM’s legal team has already challenged certain factual assertions in its responsive pleadings, setting the stage for potential motions and further hearings.

Conclusion

The lawsuit filed by Tajia Mackyeon against MGM National Harbor continues to move through the federal system, and the outcome may influence how Maryland casinos document and protect large tips received by table game employees in similar circumstances, while both sides prepare for additional proceedings that will examine the events surrounding the $76,000 in disputed chips. Additional case details appear in the original reporting, and further updates are anticipated as the litigation develops.